Effectiveness
of Mouthguards
Many sports injuries involve intraoral trauma that can be
reduced or eliminated by proper use of appropriate mouthguards.
Despite this, participants are often reluctant to wear such
protection. Dental care providers, however, can be instrumental
in changing these attitudes.
Much of the attention on athletes wearing mouthguards has
been focused on American football and rugby. The sport known
as football or futbol in many other countries is known as
soccer in Canada and the United States. Apart from football
and rugby, amateur sports that require the use of mouthguards
include boxing, ice hockey, wrestling, field hockey, and
lacrosse. Authorities on the subject recommend extending
this requirement to basketball, baseball, and soccer.
Three basic types of mouthguards are available: type I,
or stock mouthguards; type II, or mouth-formed mouthguards;
and type III mouthguards that are custom-made by a dentist
using a model of the patient's upper teeth. Type I models
are widely viewed as inferior by most evaluations. Some type
II mouthguards are made from thermoplastic materials that
are molded directly onto the maxillary arch after being softened
by boiling; hence the term boil and bite. Type III models
may be worn over orthodontic work. Commonly used materials
include polyvinylchloride, polyvinylacetate, and styrene
butadiene sheet.
One in vitro study constructed a crash test-type instrument
to simulate impacts on various types and models of mouthguards.
Results showed that type II mouthguards were only marginally
more effective in preventing tooth and jaw injuries than
no protection at all, averaging 6.0 broken teeth per impact
for no mouthguard and 4.5 broken teeth with a type II mouthguard.
Type III mouthguards achieved the best score of 0.5 broken
teeth, but considerable variation between models was noted.
Optimal results were found for mouthguards that used multiple
layers to reach desired thickness, incorporated a 9 mm labial
flange, extended to at least the first molar, and where palatal
flanges were designed for wearer comfort.
Before the use of mouthguards became mandatory in the early
1960s for US high school football, some 50% of all injuries
were to the mouth or surrounding areas, with an incidence
of facial and dental injuries of 2.26 per 100 players. After
mouthguards and facemasks became mandatory, the incidence
rate fell to 0.3. Conservative estimates put the number of
football injuries prevented annually due to the use of protective
mouthguards at 100,000 to 200,000. Mouthguards have subsequently
become mandatory in college football, though not in professional
football.
Changing
Attitudes
Much of the resistance to using mouthguards comes from attitudes
that view these protective devices as unnecessary for serious
athletes. However, some success has been noted in educational
campaigns with ice hockey players after it was shown that
mouthguards can also reduce the risk of concussion, a major
cause of player disability in the sport.
In the United States, the use of mouthguards is mandated
for such amateur sports as football, ice hockey, men's lacrosse,
and women's field hockey. Inexplicably, female teams are
often ignored in educational programs promoting the use of
mouthguards, perhaps due to the erroneous belief that women
and girls play a gentler sport, making facial injuries less
common. In fact, injury rates for specific sports tend to
be quite similar between the two sexes. It is also perplexing
that while boxing mandated the use of mouthguards back in
1913, widespread use of these protective devices has not
occurred in other contact sports.
Other common reasons given for resistance to the use of
mouthguards include a perception that they are uncomfortable,
impede breathing or talking, don't fit correctly, and cause
dry mouth. It is believed most of these complains can be
resolved through correct fitting. Attractive designs, perhaps
displaying the team logo, also seem to make mouthguards more
readily accepted. Positive role models, support from the
coach and a younger age of initiation to mouthguards all
improve acceptance of this important protective gear.
Dental care providers can play a major role in promoting
the use of mouthguards, beginning with advice on the subject.
They can fabricate properly fitted mouthguards as an integral
part of their practice. Dental care providers can also help
assure the success of clinics devoted to promoting mouthguards
by serving as consultants to teams and sponsoring more stringent
regulations for player safety.
|